Treatment for patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in the chronic kidney disease without kidney replacement therapy in real-world clinical practice: a descriptive retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In real-world clinical practice, treatments selected for patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) without kidney replacement therapy (KRT) have not been reported. This study investigated the oral treatments used in these patients and the changes in their use in recent years. Additionally, we studied the factors affecting tolvaptan dose reduction or discontinuation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the medical records of 160 hospitals in Japan. Patients with ADPKD or polycystic kidney disease registered on the database between January 2014 and December 2020 were selected. Changes in prescription proportions over time were assessed using the Cochran-Armitage test. We focused on patients prescribed with >15 mg of tolvaptan daily to identify the factors related to its dose reduction or discontinuation and used Multivariate Cox regression analysis to evaluate them. RESULTS: Tolvaptan use in patients with ADPKD in the CKD without KRT stage has increased. As of 2020, 25% of patients were treated with tolvaptan. Overall, 3639 patients with ADPKD were enrolled in the database, of whom 156 were treated with tolvaptan. Of these, 64 patients (41%) reduced or discontinued tolvaptan during the observation period. The presence of an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the beginning of the treatment was associated with a higher risk of tolvaptan dose reduction or discontinuation. CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients with ADPKD treated with high-dose tolvaptan is increasing. However, patients with late-stage CKD tended to reduce or discontinue tolvaptan.

Effect of multidisciplinary care on diabetic kidney disease: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the most common disease among patients requiring dialysis for the first time in Japan. Multidisciplinary care (MDC) may prevent the progression of kidney failure. However, the effectiveness and timing of MDC to preserve kidney function in patients with DKD is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether MDC for patients with DKD affects the preservation of kidney function as well as the timing of MDC in clinical practice. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and DKD from April 2012 to January 2020 using a nationwide Japanese healthcare record database. The fee code for medical guidance to prevent dialysis in patients with diabetes was used to distinguish between the MDC and non-MDC groups. The primary outcome was a 40% decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and secondary outcomes were death, hospitalization, permanent dialysis, kidney failure with replacement therapy, and emergency temporary catheterization. Propensity score matching was performed, and Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 9,804 eligible patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 5,614 were matched for the main analysis: 1,039 in the MDC group, and 4,575 in the non-MDC group. The primary outcome did not differ between the groups (hazard ratio: 1.18, [95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.41], P = 0.07). The groups also did not differ in terms of the secondary outcomes. Most patients with DKD received their first MDC guidance within 1 month of diagnosis, but most received guidance only once per year. CONCLUSIONS: Although we could not demonstrate the effectiveness of MDC on kidney function in patients with DKD, we clarified the characteristics of such patients assigned the fee code for medical guidance to prevent dialysis related to diabetes.

Hypothetical intervention of targeted systolic blood pressure control of < 120 mmHg on renal prognosis for persons with stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease: an application of parametric g-formula using health checkup data in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The revised KDIGO guidelines recommend maintaining systolic blood pressure (sBP) < 120 mmHg in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), based on cardiovascular and survival benefits. However, the renal benefit of this strategy remains less clear. METHODS: We used data of routine health checkups in Japan. Persons whose estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 in 2015 without end-stage disease were followed until 2020. We estimated the 5-year benefit of hypothetical targeted sBP control using parametric g-formula modeling, accounting for both time-fixed and time-varying confounding variables. Four sensitivity analyses, including analysis using a marginal structural model (MSM) and positive control outcome analysis, were also done. RESULTS: We enrolled 28,972 persons with CKD (median age: 54 years, male: 69%, baseline eGFR [median]: 56 mL/min/1.73m2). As compared with the natural course without a targeted intervention, there was no renoprotective effect of targeted sBP control, with a 5-year difference in eGFR of 0.65 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% confidence interval - 0.42 to 1.65 mL/min/1.73 m2). MSM analysis found a similar result. In contrast, the positive control analysis using the cardiovascular outcome showed that targeted sBP control would reduce the cardiovascular disease incidence by 6.0% over 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: A targeted sBP control strategy maintaining < 120 mmHg may not yield a renoprotective effect for patients with stage 3-4 CKD, although it was expected to offer a cardiovascular benefit. Future research may be warranted in higher-risk populations, such as elderly people or those with more advanced kidney disease.

Prevalence, recognition and management of chronic kidney disease in Japan: population-based estimate using a healthcare database with routine health checkup data.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to update information on the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Japan. We also explored whether CKD was properly recognized and managed. METHODS: We used data from annual health checkups in 2017, compiling records for 5 million persons. These included laboratory results and were linked to healthcare utilization records via personal identifiers. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The prevalence was compared with that in 2005. Healthcare utilization, including laboratory tests, disease coding and medication for comorbid diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HT), was used as an indicator for the recognition and management of CKD. RESULTS: Of the 761 565 records [median age 46 years (interquartile range 50-62)], CKD was found in 50 091 persons; the crude and age-adjusted prevalences were 63.1 and 71.8 per 1000 persons, respectively. CKD prevalence was significantly higher in 2017 than in 2005, with an increase of 14.1 per 1000 persons. Among persons with CKD, >95% sought medical services and 64.6% received laboratory tests within 180 days of the checkup. However, the diagnostic code suggestive of CKD was recorded in only 23.2% of patients and prescriptions for DM and HT were found in 31.2% (1590/5096) and 36.7% (8081/22 019) of comorbid persons, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of CKD in Japan has increased over the past decade. However, recognition of CKD is likely suboptimal and there is room to improve the management of comorbid DM and HT.

Risk factors of venous thromboembolism in patients with nephrotic syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Nephrotic syndrome is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the risk factors of VTE in nephrotic syndrome, other than hypoalbuminemia and severe proteinuria, are not well established. Therefore we aimed to investigate the risk factors of VTE in patients with nephrotic syndrome. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from a Japanese nationwide claims database. We identified patients ≥18 years of age hospitalized with nephrotic syndrome. Through multivariable logistic regression, we determined the risk factors of VTE in patients with nephrotic syndrome during hospitalization. RESULTS: Of the 7473 hospitalized patients with nephrotic syndrome without VTE, 221 (3.0%) developed VTE. In the VTE group, 14 (6.3%), 11 (5.0%) and 198 (89.6%) patients developed pulmonary embolism, renal vein thrombosis and deep vein thrombosis, respectively. We found that female sex {odds ratio [OR] 1.39 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.85]}, body mass index (BMI) ≥30 [OR 2.01 (95% CI 1.35-2.99)], acute kidney injury [AKI; OR 1.67 (95% CI 1.07-2.62)], sepsis [OR 2.85 (95% CI 1.37-5.93)], lupus nephritis [OR 3.64 (95% CI 1.58-8.37)] and intravenous corticosteroids use [OR 2.40 (95% CI 1.52-3.80)] were associated with a significantly higher risk of developing VTE. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with nephrotic syndrome, female sex, BMI ≥30, AKI, sepsis, lupus nephritis and intravenous corticosteroid use may help evaluate the risk of VTE.